I posted a few days ago about discrepancies between language in progressions and language seen from PARCC assessments. Well, here is something similar.
The RP progression doc states that in high school and beyond, students will write rates using derived units, something like a/b units/units (using fractions). Essentially, they will move away from the wordier version of a/b units for every 1 unit and write them in a more concise manner. This makes sense in conjunction with your statement about dimensional analysis. So, how is the following Grade 6 Smarter Balanced question fair?
Item #25 on page 27)
I would expect students to be using ratio tables, double number lines, or other ratio reasoning to convert units, not working with derived units. This seems like an inappropriate assessment question.
Am I missing something here?