Geometry Progressions

Home Forums Questions about the standards 7–12 Geometry Geometry Progressions

Viewing 3 posts - 16 through 18 (of 18 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #3224
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Post it! Can’t wait to read it!

    #3312
    GKelemanik
    Member

    Very eager to read the 7-12 Geometry Progressions Document. Any update on when a draft will become available??

    #3407
    eprebys
    Member

    I asked about this at NCTM and got the response below. Bill, please correct me if I paraphrase incorrectly:

    The progressions are still under work. The article by Wu is essentially the first draft of the progression document. There is a geometry blueprint up on IllustrativeMathematics (https://www.illustrativemathematics.org/blueprints/G).

    I responded, “So did you end up going with the Wu approach or did you couch it as Harel recommends?”

    Bill said that essentially the blueprint goes with a transformation first approach as opposed to a Euclidean approach.

    My opinions: I find Harel’s argument very convincing. That said, I am glad that Bill is making this decision. I much prefer a thoughtful decision I disagree with from him, that includes a solid explanation and a lot of coherence, over a decision from publishers with less coherence.

Viewing 3 posts - 16 through 18 (of 18 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.